Loading
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Yelp
  • LinkedIn
(251) 445-6997
Dearman Law Firm
  • About
    • Our Attorneys
    • Latest News
  • Criminal Charges
    • Capital Murder
    • Felonies
    • Civil Forfeiture
    • Terrorist Threat
    • Drug Charges
      • Drug Distribution
      • Drug Possession
      • Drug Trafficking
      • Marijuana Trafficking
    • Driving Under the Influence
    • Under Arrest
  • Federal Criminal Cases
    • Federal Firearm Charges in Alabama
  • Municipal Courts
    • Municipal Court Appeals
    • Baldwin County Directory
      • Bay Minette, Alabama
      • Daphne, Alabama
      • Elberta, Alabama
      • Fairhope, Alabama
      • Foley, Alabama
      • Gulf Shores, Alabama
      • Loxley, Alabama
      • Orange Beach, Alabama
      • Robertsdale, Alabama
      • Silverhill, Alabama
      • Spanish Fort, Alabama
      • Summerdale, Alabama
    • Mobile County Directory
      • Bayou La Batre, Alabama
      • Citronelle, Alabama
      • Chickasaw, Alabama
      • Creola, Alabama
      • Dauphin Island, Alabama
      • Mobile, Alabama
      • Prichard, Alabama
      • Saraland, Alabama
  • State Courts
    • Circuit Courts
      • Criminal Charges – Felonies
    • District Courts
      • Criminal Charges – Felonies
  • Federal Court
  • Contact Us
  • Menu Menu

Archive for category: Murder

You are here: Home1 / Latest News2 / Murder

FOX10: Jury finds Mobile man not guilty in fatal road rage shooting

November 2, 2024/in Alabama Law, Mobile, Murder/by Dearman Law Firm
https://dearmanlawfirm.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Trenton-Thorton-Not-Guilty-Murder-Dearman.mp4

MOBILE, Ala. (WALA) – A Mobile man charged with murder in a fatal road rage case has been found not guilty.

Trenton Thornton was accused of shooting and killing Patrick Edwards in February 2020.

This is the third time Thornton was tried after his two previous trials ended in a hung jury. Thornton’s attorney, Chase Dearman, says Thornton was emotional after receiving a ‘not guilty’ verdict in the courtroom Friday.

“Of course he was very emotional and of course, so was his family after being put through three trials- you can only imagine the emotion it was,” stated Dearman.

Prosecutors alleged that Thornton shot and killed Patrick Edwards in 2020 after what they called a ‘minor traffic collision.’ Thornton’s other lawyer, Dennis Knizley, argued his client acted in self-defense after Edwards pursued Thornton down a dead-end street in the Birdville community.

“It was late at night and he ended up on a dead-end road and tried to blend himself in with other cars and turn his lights off. Then the people in the other car got out and approached his car,” explained Knizley. “Thornton thought the man was about to hurt him or kill him and given all the circumstances of a high-crime area, he felt he had no choice except to defend himself and that’s what he did.”

Thornton testified that Edwards got out of the car and verbally threatened him.

“Trent’s testimony was that the man says ‘make one more move, and I’ll kill you,’ and there was a 911 call where some of this was being recorded,” said Knizley.

Knizley says the audio on that 911 call was made clearer than it was during the first two trials, and that it was consistent with Thornton’s claims.

“We heard the part- ‘make one move’ and it certainly supported Trent’s claim that the man said ‘I will kill you’ and I think that this was the determining factor in this case for the jury,” Knizley added.

In his final trial, a woman who was dating Thornton at the time of the shooting testified for the very first time. Dearman says her testimony clarified why Thornton was in the neighborhood in the first place.

“I do believe that her testimony made somewhat of an impact,” said Dearman.

In the first trial, Thornton testified, but in the second, he didn’t. This time, he took to the stand again- a strategy Knizley says the defense felt confident in.

“In self-defense cases, so many times, you must put the defendant on,” said Knizley.

Although FOX10 News did not get to speak to Patrick Edwards’ family after the verdict, FOX10 News spoke to his brother, Azelle Edwards, while the jury was still deliberating on Thursday.

Edwards says it’s been an arduous past few years.

“I wanted to say that we were trying to receive justice for my brother for the last four and a half years. My family has been going through a really bad time with this,” he said.

“These cases can be very difficult,” said Mobile District Attorney Keith Blackwood. “This verdict does not diminish the fight of our team in pursuing justice. We respect the decision of the jury and we will continue to fight for justice for all victims of crime.”

In 2022, a jury found Thornton guilty of shooting into an occupied vehicle and leaving the scene of an accident. Thornton was sentenced to 10 years behind bars, but he was only required to serve two of the 10. He’s since completed his sentence.

—

By Ashlyn Mitchell and Brendan Kirby
Published: Nov. 1, 2024 at 5:26 PM CDT
Original Article is found here.

Copyright 2024 WALA. All rights reserved.

https://dearmanlawfirm.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Trenton-Thornton-Not-Guilty-Murder-Chase-Dearman.jpg 492 935 Dearman Law Firm https://dearmanlawfirm.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/dearman_lawfirm_logo-horizontal-mobile-alabama-federal-criminal-defense-attorney-1030x315.png Dearman Law Firm2024-11-02 19:11:552024-11-02 19:28:57FOX10: Jury finds Mobile man not guilty in fatal road rage shooting
Chase Dearman appears on FOX10 TV WALA

FOX10: Testimony: Mobile woman lured shooting victim into van to set up robbery

January 31, 2023/in Alabama Law, District Court, Felony Charges, Mobile, Murder/by Dearman Law Firm

MOBILE, Ala. (WALA) – A woman charged with helping to set up a robbery that led to a fatal shooting last year lured the victim from a Tillman’s Corner motel room, a police investigator testified Tuesday.

Detective Rory Graves, of the Mobile Police Department, said surveillance video from the motel on April 26 shows Dejean Washington getting into a van driven by Maranda Shardae Gamble. He testified that a passenger in the vehicle is not visible in the video but that investigators believe it was Jermi Anrichio Adams, who is accused of firing the fatal shots.

Mobile County District Judge George Zoghby ruled Tuesday that prosecutors had presented enough evidence for a grand jury to consider indictments against Adams, 28, for murder and Gamble, 21, for felony murder.

“There’s a couple different locations involved here,” Mobile County District Attorney Keith Blackwood said outside the courtroom.

The victim and the two defendants knew one another, but the precise nature of their relationship remains unclear. Graves testified that Gamble gave conflicting information to authorities but eventually said that she overheard a conversation between Adams and someone else talking about a robbery.

Graves testified that Gamble believed the three were going to go to New Orleans first and then would return to the Prichard area but that they ended up going directly to the Plateau community. At that point, Gamble told investigators, Adams pulled out a gun and that Washington tried to grab it. She also told investigators that Adams pointed the gun at her, according to the testimony.

Police responding to Center Street and Wood Alley that evening found the 34-year-old’s body on the ground with four gunshot wounds. Graves testified that investigators found nine 9mm shell casings but not the murder weapon.

Gamble’s attorney, Chase Dearman, pressed Graves during cross-examination about whether there is any evidence suggesting his client fired the gun.

“To my knowledge, no,” the detective acknowledged.

Police put out a Be-On-The-Lookout for a van driving by Gamble, and sheriff’s deputies in Georgia arrested her during a traffic stop early the next morning. She was not charged, however. Graves testified that investigators wanted to talk to her but that she was not at that time a suspect.

Charges did not come until after police arrested Adams this month and Gamble earlier this month.

“Maranda Gamble is charged with felony murder because we believe that evidence tends to show that she intended to participate in the robbery that then led to the death of the victim in this case,” Blackwood said.

But Dearman said after the hearing that Gamble was not part of any criminal plot.

“In that car ride, my client overheard something to do with a robbery,” he said. “And she didn’t know when or how it would ever take place. They go to a place. They get out of a car. The guy pulls a gun, starts shooting and both the victim and my clients start running. And that’s the simplest of it.”

Under felony murder law, a person can be convicted if prosecutors prove that he or she was committing a crime – in this case robbery – that led to the victim’s death.

Graves also testified that text messages from Gamble’s cell phone indicate that she was in on the robbery planning. But Dearman argued that it was Adams using her phone.

Dearman sought to dispute any suggestion that Gamble was fleeing when deputies on Georgia’s Coweta County pulled her over at about 3 a.m. He said that is where his client’s mother lives.

“She was simply going home,” he said.

—

Original Article found here.
By Brendan Kirby
Published: Jan. 31, 2023 at 5:25 PM CST

https://dearmanlawfirm.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/chase-dearman-defense-attorney-mobile-al-fox10.png 1024 1830 Dearman Law Firm https://dearmanlawfirm.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/dearman_lawfirm_logo-horizontal-mobile-alabama-federal-criminal-defense-attorney-1030x315.png Dearman Law Firm2023-01-31 17:25:512023-02-22 19:21:27FOX10: Testimony: Mobile woman lured shooting victim into van to set up robbery
Chase Dearman Mobile AL NYE Attorney DUI

NBC15: NYE shooter held without bond under new Aniah’s Law

January 12, 2023/in Alabama Law, Felony Charges, Mobile, Murder/by Dearman Law Firm

MOBILE, Ala. (WPMI) — The accused killer in the New Year’s Eve mass shooting in downtown Mobile will be held without bond under Aniah’s law, which aims to keep particularly dangerous and violent offenders off the streets. A detention hearing was held Thursday afternoon for Thomas Thomas, who is accused of opening fire on Dauphin Street and killing Jatarius Rieves.

A homicide detective testified 22 shots were fired that night. The call to police came in at 11:14 PM. Four officers were in the immediate proximity. In total, 10 people were shot. One of the shooting victims told the detective it sounded like a machine gun. Police testified Thomas had a 40 caliber Glock handgun with an extended clip and modified it illegally by putting a switch on it, which turns semi-automatic guns into automatic ones. Police say ballistic evidence shows he fired 16 of the 22 shots. One of those struck Jatarius Rieves in the head. Another person 23-year-old Morgan Peters fired back 6 shots. He was also critically wounded.

Surveillance video captured the shooting and moments leading up to it. Both sides conceded the incident appeared to begin with words exchanged. But the defense claims after those words were exchanged, Rieves was the aggressor, and Thomas acted in self-defense.

“He said, ‘I’m going to shoot.’ I don’t wish to cuss on the news, but ‘I wish to shoot you.’ And then when he came back, pull this up. He thought he was pulling the gun to shoot it. I mean, it’s that simple. And unfortunately, not only is he denied bond, but he’s not going to be able to get an immunity hearing until he gets to circuit court,” said defense attorney Chase Dearman.

The court room was packed, and there were some tense moments in court. The judge ordered no contact between the two sides. The Public Safety Director, as well as Mobile Police Chief Paul Prine were in attendance, which is unusual for pretrial hearings.

“This is a new law and we want to make sure certainly that the judicial system, we want to make sure that the prosecutors are understanding just how important this law is for us and certainly for Mobilians here in the city,” said Prine.

The detention hearing district court also served as Thomas’ preliminary hearing. The case will now go to a grand jury. Thomas’ defense attorney says he plans to appeal the no bond order.

—

Original Article found here.
By Andrea Ramey
Thursday, January 12th 2023

https://dearmanlawfirm.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Chase-Dearman-Mobile-Alabama-NYE-Attorney-DUI.png 1024 1921 Dearman Law Firm https://dearmanlawfirm.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/dearman_lawfirm_logo-horizontal-mobile-alabama-federal-criminal-defense-attorney-1030x315.png Dearman Law Firm2023-01-12 17:52:582023-02-22 19:59:09NBC15: NYE shooter held without bond under new Aniah’s Law
Chase Dearman Criminal Defense AttorneyWALA

FOX10: Fentanyl from I-10 seizure was enough to kill 1.5 million people, Mobile County prosecutor says

October 20, 2022/in Alabama Law, Alabama Supreme Court, District Court, Drug Charges, Mobile, Murder/by Dearman Law Firm

MOBILE, Ala. (WALA) – A pair of California men on Wednesday pleaded not guilty to drug trafficking and possession charges related to what authorities say was the largest fentanyl bust in Mobile County’s history.

Lener Daneski Jiron Solies, 27, of Norwalk, Calif., and Zeshan Malik Fayyaz, 26, of Hawthorne, Calif., appeared remotely via video hookup from Mobile County Metro Jail. Mobile County District Judge George Zoghby left in place bonds of $1.5 million each. The order requires those bonds to be paid in cash, a condition that the defendants’ lawyers said is tantamount to denying bail.

In a sign of how significant prosecutors consider the case, Mobile County Chief Assistant District Attorney Keith Blackwood personally handled the arraignment. He told Zoghby that the seized fentanyl bricks exceeded 3 kilograms, an amount he said could produce 1.5 million lethal doses.

“Fentanyl is presenting us with a complete paradigm shift,” Blackwood told the judge, later adding, “As bad as cocaine is, as bad as meth is, as bad as heroin is, fentanyl is a game-changer. People are dying from it every day.”

The arrest occurred on Oct. 8, hours after the Mobile County Sheriff’s Office announced an unrelated fentanyl bust at the Dreamland Skate Center in Tillman’s Corner.

According to authorities, Solies was driving a rental car when deputies pulled the vehicle over on Interstate 10 near the Dauphin Island Parkway exit for an expired tag. Blackwood said a drug-sniffing dog alerted to the presence of narcotics and that a subsequent searched turned up the fentanyl, along with 3 grams of cocaine.

Blackwood said Solies did not have a driver’s license. He said the defendants later told investigators that they were driving from the Los Angeles area to Pensacola.

Blackwood argued for maintaining the initial bonds set by Mobile County District Judge Spiro Cheriogotis. He said the defendants have no ties to Mobile County and face, based on the volume of fentanyl, a mandatory sentence of life in prison if convicted. He also reiterated how deadly the drug is.

“That’s why it is so dangerous,” he said. “That’s why every aspect of the criminal justice system must take fentanyl prosecutions seriously.”

Chase Dearman, an attorney for Solies, objected to Blackwood’s characterization of how many people the drugs would kill.

“There is no chart that I’m aware of that’s been accepted in a court of law that converts a certain weight of a certain substance to a number of deaths,” he said.

Dearman acknowledged that fentanyl is a dangerous drug but added, “All drugs are dangerous. All of them are.”

Dearman said that although his client is accused of transporting drugs, no one has alleged that he is a drug dealer.

“My client is not guilty,” he said outside the courtroom. “He’s not admitting to anything at this time. Period.”

Stewart Hanley, an attorney for Fayyaz, said his client is the son of immigrants with no criminal record and a consistent work history. He noted that the defendant’s parents were in court Wednesday and argued that a $75,000 bond with electronic monitoring and other conditions would be more appropriate.

“He’s a 26-year-old born and raised in the U.S. … This is a young man with no criminal history,” he said.

A woman identifying herself as the defendant’s sister said, “We would take full responsibility.”

Dearman told the judge that he intends to wait until after the preliminary hearing to revisit bond, but he said after the hearing that $250,000 would be fair. He noted that the current $1.5 million is equivalent to the maximum bond amount set by the Alabama Supreme Court in murder cases.

“My client didn’t murder anybody,” he said. “And at this stage of the game, the law simply states he’s presumed innocent, and he should be entitled to a reasonable bond. There is no way he can afford a $1.5 million cash bond. Very few people can.”

https://dearmanlawfirm.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Chase-Dearman-Criminal-Defense-Attorney.png 1024 1827 Dearman Law Firm https://dearmanlawfirm.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/dearman_lawfirm_logo-horizontal-mobile-alabama-federal-criminal-defense-attorney-1030x315.png Dearman Law Firm2022-10-20 07:16:292022-10-20 07:18:56FOX10: Fentanyl from I-10 seizure was enough to kill 1.5 million people, Mobile County prosecutor says
Mobile Alabama Federal Criminal Defense Attorney OfficeDearman Law Firm

FOX 10: Brother of man shot by Mobile police made threats from jail, prosecutors say

February 9, 2021/in Alabama Law, District Court, Mobile, Murder, Robbery/by Dearman Law Firm

MOBILE, Ala. (WALA) – The brother of a man shot to death by police on Thursday made threatening comments after his arrest, prosecutors said Monday.

Mobile County District Judge Spiro Cheriogotis ordered Tyhre Webster, 22, to remain in jail at least until a court hearing on Feb. 22 to consider a prosecution request to revoke Webster’s bond on a charge of shooting into an occupied vehicle.

A Mobile County police detective testified Monday that Webster made threats against police during a hone call from the jail, where police had booked him on charges of threatening a witness and reckless endangerment.

“There was evidence presented today of a phone call that Tyhre made from Metro Jail, where he indicated that he was going to harm the police if he should get out,” Mobile County Chief Assistant District Attorney Keith Blackwood told FOX10 News. “That evidence was presented to the judge, and based on that and every other factor that we have in this case, we asked that he be held with no bond, and the judge agreed and held him in that bond.”

Webster’s attorney, Chalea Tisdale, had a case in federal court on Monday. Lawyer Chase Dearman, who was standing in for her in Mobile County District Court, argued to the judge that Webster’s comments should be viewed in light of his raw emotions

“His brother was shot and killed by police,” he said. “His mother was shot in the foot.”

Mobile Police Chief Lawrence Battiste has said investigators believe Dearman said Treyh Webster shot at police as they tried to serve warrants on Thursday at the house on Lakeview Drive East. The chief told reporters that the SWAT team returned fire, killing Webster. He also said investigators believe Webster accidentally shot his mother’s foot.

The woman, Georgette Sons, told FOX10 News on Sunday that she does not believe police were justified in shooting her son. She said police should simply have knocked on the door.

In court Monday, Dearman said Tyhre Webster’s statements during the jail phone call were general in nature.

“There was no direct threat. … It was just a general situation,” he said.

Tisdale told FOX10 News that she intends to oppose the motion to revoke Webster’s bond. She said she understands her client said something to the effect of, “I’m not going to let them get away with it” during a conversation with his girlfriend’s mother.

“None of the family wants that to happen,” she said. “They all want justice. … I do not consider that a threat.”

Tisdale said the phone call took place the day after her client’s brother died.

“He was distraught,” she said.

Tyhre Webster stands charged with intimidating a witness and reckless endangerment. Those charges were the basis of arrest warrants police were trying to serve both Webster brothers on Thursday. Prosecutors allege that both brothers last month tried to ram the victim of a robbery committed by Treyh Webster. Treyh Webster fired five shots into the air, according to the allegations.

Prosecutors contend the encounter was an attempt to pressure the victim into not testifying.

—

Original found on Fox 10

https://dearmanlawfirm.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/mobile-alabama-federal-criminal-defense-attorney-office.jpg 1024 1820 Dearman Law Firm https://dearmanlawfirm.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/dearman_lawfirm_logo-horizontal-mobile-alabama-federal-criminal-defense-attorney-1030x315.png Dearman Law Firm2021-02-09 01:05:262021-05-01 15:35:42FOX 10: Brother of man shot by Mobile police made threats from jail, prosecutors say
Alabama Supreme Court

LAGNIAPPE: Judge, lawyer take war of words to Montgomery

November 13, 2019/0 Comments/in Alabama Law, Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, Alabama Supreme Court, Circuit Court, Mobile, Murder/by Dearman Law Firm

“OK, Let me know when I can speak.”

“If you’re going to make an objection, you’re not going to speak.”

“May the record reflect that I’m not allowed to make…”

“Get him out of here. Take the lawyer out. Get out.”

“May the record reflect…”

“Get out.”

“… that I’m being ordered out of the courtroom…”

“Get out.”

“… and the judge has lost his temper…”

“Get out.”

“…. Again.”

“Get out. Take him back.”


From Lagniappe Mobile: Posted by Jason Johnson | Nov 6, 2019 | Bay Briefs

That was the official court transcript from a heated exchange in February between Mobile County Circuit Judge Jim Patterson and local defense attorney Chase Dearman after a probation revocation hearing for one of Dearman’s clients appears to have run entirely off the rails.
The incident led to Dearman being held in contempt by Patterson, and since then, the issue has been appealed, remanded, affirmed and appealed again all the way up the Alabama Supreme Court. It’s one of two cases Dearman has challenged from Patterson’s courtroom and taken up to the high court this year.

Both he and Patterson declined to speak on the record, though much has been laid out in public filings.

The contempt case started during a probation revocation hearing for one of Dearman’s clients who was allegedly found in possession of synthetic marijuana. At the hearing, Dearman objected to a patrol officer positively identifying the substance he found in his client’s car, claiming the officer had “no training in narcotics whatsoever” and that synthetic marijuana was not “regularly identifiable.”

Patterson shot down the objection and maintained the rules for a trial wouldn’t apply during a simple probation hearing, and that the officer was allowed to testify to what he found during a traffic stop. Still, Dearman wanted to object in order to preserve the issue for the record and persisted.

That’s where things seemed to go awry.

According to the transcript, when Dearman tried again to get his objection on the record, Patterson told him “there was no objection” and then repeatedly stated “the rules don’t apply” over Dearman’s continued efforts to support his position. It doesn’t appear Patterson formally overruled the objection.

Patterson later wrote that he threw Dearman out of court because he felt his conduct was “a challenge to the court’s authority” and it was necessary to “promptly punish” him for the behavior. Dearman disagreed and quickly appealed to the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals.

That appeals court found Patterson erred because he never actually told Dearman he was being held in contempt while kicking him out of the courtroom, and because he didn’t allow him “a reasonable opportunity” to excuse or mitigate his actions. However, after it was remanded back to Patterson and a hearing was held to correct those procedural concerns, the appeals court upheld the contempt charge.

Dearman has argued he couldn’t have been challenging Patterson’s ruling on his objection because Patterson never made one saying instead that “there is no objection.” The next stop was the Alabama Supreme Court, which is currently considering an appeal of the lower appellate court’s decision.

It’s worth noting Dearman has had issues with other judges this year as well. In April, District Judge Joe Basenberg held him in contempt and actually briefly detained him for an alleged comment he made after a ruling denying a motion to adjust the conditions of one of his client’s bonds.

Basenberg claims that after his order, Dearman immediately said in open court that the court’s decision was “ridiculous” or “absolutely ridiculous.” Basenberg went on to state that “both the manner and tone of the statement displayed an extreme level of insult and disrespect to the court.”

The other case involving Patterson that Dearman has appealed to the supreme court is also pending, but it has already led to an accused murderer being released from jail. In that case, Dearman claims Patterson revoked a client’s bond “without any legal basis” over his concerns with local court funding.

That client, Calvin Barnes, was charged with murder in 2016 for allegedly killing his brother-in-law, Eric Smith. He was initially scheduled to go on trial in 2018, but was delayed on multiple occasions, some at Barnes’ request and some at the state’s. Eventually, the trial was reset for May 13 in Patterson’s court.

However, three days before the trial began, Barnes made the decision to drop Dennis Knizley as his attorney and replace him with Dearman, who at the time was still in the middle of his appeals battle with Patterson over the contempt charge mentioned above. Patterson perceived the change of attorneys as an effort to delay the case and revoked Barnes’ bond despite the state never asking him to do so.

“This has the feel of the purpose to delay the inevitable. That’s what it feels like to me,” Patterson said at the hearing that day. “And so, frankly, I’m going to revoke his bond because I think — we are too broke. This circuit is too broke to [allow] another precious trial setting to pass.”

Court funding has been a significant focus for Patterson, who has drawn attention on several occasions by stating publicly that the local judicial system is “dead ass broke.” He also attempted to take legal action against the state last year to prevent money collected in local courts from going to the general fund in Montgomery — an effort that led to him being sternly admonished by the Supreme Court in June.

In the Barnes’ case, Patterson set a bond revocation hearing the day after he’d already ordered the bond revoked, which is allowed under the rules of criminal procedure. At the hearing, Patterson himself seemed to acknowledge he was getting into uncharted territory by revoking Barnes’ bond of his volition.

“I will tell you on the record that I did some research yesterday, and I don’t know that there’s any precedent for what I did. This may be an issue of first impression,” the transcript reads. “I stand on the record that I made yesterday about how this case proceeded. I stand on the record about the defendant terminating Mr. Knizley, who has an excellent reputation as attorney, on the eve of trial.”

Last month, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals stayed Patterson’s order revoking Barnes’ bond as it considers Dearman’s appeal of the decision. He has since been released from custody at Mobile Metro Jail and has a new trial date set in 2020. Dearman withdrew from his case altogether in August.


Update: After this article was published, Dearman sent the following comment on his contempt previous charge in Judge Basenberg’s courtroom.

“The law of contempt clearly states the attorney shall be given an opportunity to mitigate his actions. The reason for that mitigation is to allow things to cool down. An adversarial proceeding can make for a heated atmosphere. The actual freedom of a citizen is at stake. After five minutes, that is exactly what happened. Both the judge and myself settled down. Although I don’t believe my conduct met the definition of contemptuous, I was wrong and Judge Basenburg was right to call me out on it. I have the utmost respect for Judge Basenburg personally and as a judge.”

https://dearmanlawfirm.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Alabama-Supreme-Court.jpg 492 1024 Dearman Law Firm https://dearmanlawfirm.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/dearman_lawfirm_logo-horizontal-mobile-alabama-federal-criminal-defense-attorney-1030x315.png Dearman Law Firm2019-11-13 15:25:132019-11-13 15:31:13LAGNIAPPE: Judge, lawyer take war of words to Montgomery

WKRG: Case against Ladd-Peebles Stadium shooting suspect moves forward

November 6, 2019/0 Comments/in District Court, Alabama Law, Felony Charges, Mobile, Murder/by Dearman Law Firm

MOBILE, Ala. (WKRG) — The case against the teenager charged in the shooting at Ladd-Peebles Stadium in August is moving forward.

17-year-old Deangelo Parnell was in court Wednesday for a preliminary hearing. Parnell is charged with nine counts of attempted murder.

A Mobile Police Detective testified that one of the victims identified Parnell as a shooter. The detective also said surveillance video showed Parnell firing shots.

Ballistics show two guns were fired from two separate locations. The other shooter has not been found.

Parnell’s lawyer argued that police cannot prove that his client shot any of the victims. The detective said police are awaiting ballistics to come back to show who was shot with what weapon.

The judge decided there is enough evidence in the case to send Parnell’s case to a grand jury.

The shooting happened following the LeFlore-Williamson game on August 30. Police say the shooting stemmed from a fight. Nine people were injured in the shooting.

Parnell’s lawyer also asked the judge to reconsider bond. Parnell’s bond is now set at $405,000. If he makes bond, Parnell will be under electronic monitoring. Parnell is not to carry a weapon of any kind. He is also not to have contact with any of the victims.

https://dearmanlawfirm.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/iStock_000009093793Small.jpg 565 850 Dearman Law Firm https://dearmanlawfirm.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/dearman_lawfirm_logo-horizontal-mobile-alabama-federal-criminal-defense-attorney-1030x315.png Dearman Law Firm2019-11-06 14:45:272019-11-08 14:46:28WKRG: Case against Ladd-Peebles Stadium shooting suspect moves forward
McAlpine, Accused Chevron shooting defendant in court

McAlpine, Accused Chevron shooting defendant in court

November 7, 2018/0 Comments/in Mobile, Alabama Law, Felony Charges, Murder, Robbery/by Dearman Law Firm

MOBILE, Ala. (WKRG) – The two men accused of robbery and shooting three men at a Chevron gas station in July of this year were in court for a preliminary hearing on Wednesday morning. Emanuel McAlpine is charged with three counts of attempted murder and robbery. Ghacquez Ludgood is charged with robbery.

A Mobile Police detective gave testimony in court that three men were shot in the head during the robbery on July 31, 2018. Surveillance video showed a man come in and point a gun at the clerk behind the register. Police have identified that suspect at McAlpine. According to investigators, McAlpine shot the clerk in the eye and went into the back room of the store. Detectives say that’s where McAlpine brought another man up to the register and shot him twice, once in the chest and once in the face. McAlpine is then accused of trying to make a third man open the register. When that victim was unable to open the register, police say McAlpine shot him in the head.

In court testimony Wednesday, police say they got a tip from the public that led them to McAlpine. Investigators say they looked though his Facebook photos and were able to identify McAlpine by a tattoo. Police found McAlpine a few days later, but say he had another tattoo covering up the original, identifying tattoo.

Investigators say when McAlpine was questioned about the July 31 robbery and shooting, he told police he and Ludgood went to the store to confront one of the victims about an alleged rape involving Ludgood’s sister. Prosecutors and police don’t believe that is true.

“There’s absolutely no evidence that would corroborate that In any way,” said Assistant District Attorney Keith Blackwood. “We heard testimony about communications between the two defendants on Facebook. This was clearly a robbery that turned into a shooting.”

Detectives say McAlpine told them he and Ludgood conspired to commit the robbery. McAlpine told police Ludgood ran before the crime was committed.

“Just because somebody says something does not mean it’s a voluntary confession,” said Chase Dearman who is representing McAlpine. “Before it can be admitted into any trial against somebody’s guilt, it has to be proved that it was voluntary.”

Ludgood allegedly told police he bailed out of the plan before the robbery and that McAlpine acted alone.

The three shooting victims have not positively identified McApline as being the man who shot them. So far, police have been unable to find the gun used in the shooting.

A judge set bond for Emanuel McAlpine at $400,000, but 5% of that must be paid in cash. However, McAlpine will be held without bond while the court considers a motion to revoke bond in another case.

The case involving McAlpine and Ludgood will now be sent to a Mobile County Grand Jury.

https://dearmanlawfirm.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/mcalpine-mobile-alabama.jpg 720 1278 Dearman Law Firm https://dearmanlawfirm.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/dearman_lawfirm_logo-horizontal-mobile-alabama-federal-criminal-defense-attorney-1030x315.png Dearman Law Firm2018-11-07 21:20:062018-11-07 21:34:26McAlpine, Accused Chevron shooting defendant in court
Emanuel McAlpine doesn't seek bond Mobile, Alabama Criminal Defense Chase Dearman Law Firm

Suspect in Shooting, McAlpine, Doesn’t Seek Bond

September 14, 2018/0 Comments/in Alabama Law, Felony Charges, Mobile, Murder, Robbery/by Dearman Law Firm
Read more
https://dearmanlawfirm.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/emanuel-mcalpine-doesnt-seek-bond-mobile-alabama-criminal-defense-chase-dearman-law-firm.jpg 1024 1820 Dearman Law Firm https://dearmanlawfirm.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/dearman_lawfirm_logo-horizontal-mobile-alabama-federal-criminal-defense-attorney-1030x315.png Dearman Law Firm2018-09-14 23:32:532018-09-15 12:23:23Suspect in Shooting, McAlpine, Doesn’t Seek Bond
Mobile County Court Courtroom

LAGNIAPPE: Rare conviction does little to console family of texting-while-driving victim

April 15, 2016/0 Comments/in Alabama Law, Felony Charges, Manslaughter, Mobile, Murder, Texting and Driving/by Dearman Law Firm

Connie Hamilton was in slow motion.

From the moment she heard the news about her 24-year-old daughter, Randi Hamilton — who had been rushed to the emergency room at University of South Alabama medical center minutes earlier — she didn’t feel like she could move at normal speeds.

“I knew she was really bad … then the emergency room doctor came in and knelt down, took my hand and I knew what he was going to say,” she said. “When that doctor told me that she didn’t make it, it just was slow motion right after that and I don’t remember when I came out of [it].”

Randi was on her way to one of her final classes as a student at the University of South Alabama when she was killed as a result of a collision caused by a Mississippi man who Mobile County District Attorney Ashley Rich said was “fixated” on his phone at the time of the crash.

The former Theodore High School cheerleader was thrown from her truck before her body hit a pine tree and landed in a driveway. Connie Hamilton was later told by witnesses that homeowners in the area formed a prayer circle around her.

“That made me feel a little bit better knowing she didn’t die alone out there,” Hamilton said. “I have a really hard time, even now, believing she’s gone. It’s just hard for me to believe and every day I just trudge on.”

Randi was just three weeks from graduation and along with her aunt had been planning a party in anticipation of the big day. In one of the toughest situations her mother had to take on, those plans had to be scrapped for a funeral.

“I was — I had family around me that helped me, that told me what to do,” she said. “Pretty much they had to tell me what to do.”

Randi’s sister, Samantha, joined their mother in wanting to do one last thing for her. Connie said they wanted to dress her “to a ‘T’” for the funeral, but when it came time for the service at Travis Road Baptist Church, they decided to close the casket.

“We just had to do that,” Hamilton said. “I think back on it now and it’s hard for me to even think about that because of seeing your child in a casket. Nobody should ever have to do that.”

Family life
Connie Hamilton divorced when Randi and Samantha were young, so for much of their life it was just the three of them together in Theodore. As typical siblings growing up, Randi and Samantha didn’t always get along. Connie Hamilton said once both of them moved out on their own, though, they grew closer.

“They had just started getting into that, which was really, really nice to see,” she said. “It’s really satisfying as a parent to see them finally getting along with each other and really enjoying each other’s company.”

The relationship between the three women meant a lot to Samantha as well, as detailed in her impact statement given to Circuit Judge Robert Smith at the sentencing hearing of the Mississippi man convicted of manslaughter for the crash that killed her sister last week in Mobile.

“My heart breaks due to this tragedy,” Samantha said. “For the rest of my life, we will both cry for Randi. We will cry together and we will cry separately.”

In the statement, Samantha described long, “unbearable” nights and how she has cried in bed for two years thinking of her lost sister.

Plans for the future
Like most college seniors, Randi was looking forward to graduation and had been starting to research future employment leads as a biomedical major with a marketing minor. As a vet tech for much of her early working life, Randi was hopeful she would secure a job as a pet pharmaceutical sales representative. She had found a job opening with a new company in Daphne and had filled out an application before the wreck.

“That application was found on her bedside table,” Connie Hamilton said. “She was intending on faxing it that week.”

An alumnus of USA herself, Hamilton said she knew how it felt to have a degree in her hands and wanted Randi to graduate.

“Just to have that diploma in your hand and know this is something you achieved yourself,” she said. “I really wanted her to feel that and she never did. She never got the chance.”

Randi was always the type of person looking for the next adventure, her mother said. It didn’t have to be all that exciting; in fact, it could simply be the next holiday on the calendar, but Randi was always in the mood to plan for it. She was planning for bigger life events following graduation as well.

“She was looking forward to starting a family,” Hamilton said. “She and her boyfriend had plans of getting married.”

In her impact statement, Samantha also mentioned her sadness over never being able to become a maid of honor for Randi, nor Randi returning the favor “when I make the step to become a wife.”

First-of-its-kind conviction
The driver of the truck that hit Randi’s vehicle, Jonathan Mikael Raynes, was later charged with and convicted of manslaughter as a result of the wreck — a conviction Rich called a first-of-its-type case in the state.

Raynes was sentenced on April 6 by Judge Smith to 10 years split with two years to serve in prison and two years’ probation. The other eight years were suspended, meaning if Raynes violates the terms of his probation he could serve more time.

During the hearing, Rich asked for a 10-year sentence split to serve five years, arguing Raynes had a number of recent traffic citations and had been involved in a wreck in Louisiana before the Mobile case went to trial.

Raynes’ attorney, Chase Dearman, did not return a phone call to his office this week requesting comment for this story. The case is being appealed and while the appeal process takes place, Raynes is out on a $60,000 bond.

While Rich told Smith the eyes of the community were on him as he sent a message with the sentence, Dearman argued his client’s actions merited only probation and no jail time.

“Jonathan was in a car accident … and the jury found him guilty of looking at his cell phone,” Dearman said. “I’m guilty of that…. There is absolutely no reason why probation or front-end diversion type of sentence won’t work.”

Dearman also told the judge that his client, who doesn’t speak well in public, was sorry for what happened to Randi. Several witnesses spoke on Raynes’ behalf during the hearing, including his father, a neighbor and the preacher at his church near Purvis, Mississippi.

After Smith ruled, Hamilton said she hadn’t thought much about the sentence.

“I’ve never been focused on the sentence for him,” she said. “I wanted the felony conviction that would stay with him the rest of his life because this will stay with me the rest of my life.”

While Rich said she believes this is the first conviction in the state for the relatively new texting law, it doesn’t mean district attorneys will seek the same charges under similar circumstances.

“This was an extremely egregious case,” Rich told a gaggle of reporters following the sentencing. “He uploaded pictures of himself to the phone while driving … and toggled on social media between women he wanted to meet.”

She added her office would be willing to help teach other prosecutors in the state how to successfully bring and win similar cases in the future.

A growing trend
During the hearing, Dearman brought up how common it is to see drivers texting while traveling various thoroughfares around Mobile. Rich also made mention of how common it has become, in asking Smith to make an example of Raynes. For her part, Connie Hamilton said she hopes Randi’s death can serve as a reminder to area drivers to stay off phones while driving.

“Seriously, it’s not worth it,” she said. “It’s not — nobody should have to bury their child and it’s just not worth it. You know it doesn’t matter what the phone call is, or what you’re doing with your phone. Wait until you’re not behind the wheel to do it.”

With the proliferation of smartphones and the sheer number of vehicles on the road, Hamilton said she doesn’t believe the problem will go away.

“You see young people these days and they’re so attached to their phones,” she said. “I don’t see that getting any better. I don’t see people shying away from their phone.”

In 2015 Alabama State Troopers wrote 682 citations for texting while driving, trooper spokesman Cpl. Jess Thornton said. Since the law was enacted in August 2012, more than 1,400 tickets have been written.

The law can be tricky to enforce, though, Thornton said, because it’s not illegal for a driver to be on his or her phone; the driver has to be texting.

CORRECTION: The original version of this article misidentified the judge presiding over the manslaughter case.

Via: Lagniappe written by Dale Liesch.

https://dearmanlawfirm.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Mobile-County-Court-Courtroom.jpg 675 1200 Dearman Law Firm https://dearmanlawfirm.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/dearman_lawfirm_logo-horizontal-mobile-alabama-federal-criminal-defense-attorney-1030x315.png Dearman Law Firm2016-04-15 15:32:272016-04-15 15:32:27LAGNIAPPE: Rare conviction does little to console family of texting-while-driving victim
Page 1 of 212

Chase Dearman and Maxine Walters of the Dearman Law Firm handles trials and appeals in the following areas:

birmingham, alabama, homewood, alabama, hoover, alabama, vestavia, alabama, mountain brook, alabama, leeds, alabama, gardendale, alabama, fultondale, alabama, pelham, alabama, alabaster, alabama, tarrant, alabama, trussville, alabama, anniston, alabama, gadsden, alabama, tuscaloosa, alabama, huntsville, alabama, decatur, alabama, montgomery, alabama, cullman, alabama, mobile, alabama, dothan, alabama, troy, alabama, enterprise, alabama, bessemer, alabama, adamsville, alabama, columbiana, alabama, jefferson, shelby, st. clair, walker, bibb, chilton, tuscaloosa,madison, montgomery, calhoun, tallapoosa, talladega, winston, coffee, covington, dale, lawrence, lauderdale, colbert, limestone, marshall, blount, fayette, marion, morgan, cleburne, pickens, coosa, clay, geneva, pike, crenshaw, cullman, baldwin, mobile, escambia, wilcox, florence, alabama, federal court northern district of alabama, federal court middle district of alabama, federal court southern district of alabama, federal court eleventh circuit court of appeals, alabama court of criminal appeals, alabama court of civil appeals, supreme court of alabama
The Alabama State Bar requires the following statement: No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your calls, letters and electronic mail. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established.
Dearman Law Firm Criminal Defense Lawyer Mobile Alabama
Dearman Law Firm
208 Dauphin Street
2nd Floor Crescent Building
Mobile, AL 36602
Phone: +1 (251) 445-6997
OFFICE HOURS
Mon-Fri: 8:00AM - 5:00PM

Get Directions

Get Directions

Helpful Links

Alabama Courts

Code of Alabama

U.S. Courts | The Federal Judiciary

Mobile County Alabama Probate

Mobile County State Court System

Mobile County Probate Court

City of Mobile Municipal Court

Southern District of Alabama United States Bankruptcy Court

United States District Court: Southern District of Alabama

PACER: Public Access to Court Electronic Records

Latest News from Dearman Law

  • FOX10: Jury finds Mobile man not guilty in fatal road rage shootingNovember 2, 2024 - 7:11 pm

    MOBILE, Ala. (WALA) – A Mobile man charged with murder in a fatal road rage case has been found not guilty. Trenton Thornton was accused of shooting and killing Patrick Edwards in February 2020. This is the third time Thornton was tried after his two previous trials ended in a hung jury. Thornton’s attorney, Chase […]

DISCLAIMER

The Alabama State Bar requires the following statement: No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your calls, letters and electronic mail. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until an attorney-client relationship is established.
© Copyright 2014 - 2024 - DEARMAN LAW FIRM - powered by Enfold WordPress Theme
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Yelp
  • LinkedIn
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Sitemap
Scroll to top